Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Al Arabiya-Saudi Arabia) Makram Rabah - The U.S. government officially delivered its final proposal to Lebanon outlining a roadmap for resolving the country's security crisis. It offers a phased plan for Hizbullah's disarmament - beginning with its heavy weapons, followed by drones, and ending with individual arms. It also calls for a cessation of Israeli strikes, Israeli withdrawal from remaining occupied points in southern Lebanon, and the release of Lebanese detainees. In return, the U.S. and its international partners pledge robust support for Lebanon's reconstruction and economic recovery - contingent upon full compliance with these demands. For decades, Hizbullah has operated beyond the authority of the Lebanese state, unaccountable to its institutions, immune from criticism, and increasingly divorced from the national interest. Its narrative of "resistance" has become a threadbare excuse for political domination, economic capture, and social coercion. It is not merely unwilling to relinquish its weapons - it is unwilling to acknowledge the authority of the very state it claims to protect. Hizbullah is no longer seen as an organic Lebanese actor, but as an Iranian asset whose wars do not rally national unity. We are witnessing the unraveling of a political-military entity whose bluff has been called. Its weapons were never about defending Lebanon, they were about dominating it. When faced with a genuine military threat, Hizbullah collapsed. Hizbullah's arsenal no longer serves as a deterrent against Israel. It has become a liability. The writer is an assistant professor of history at the American University of Beirut. 2025-08-07 00:00:00Full Article
Hizbullah's Arsenal Has Become a Liability to Lebanon
(Al Arabiya-Saudi Arabia) Makram Rabah - The U.S. government officially delivered its final proposal to Lebanon outlining a roadmap for resolving the country's security crisis. It offers a phased plan for Hizbullah's disarmament - beginning with its heavy weapons, followed by drones, and ending with individual arms. It also calls for a cessation of Israeli strikes, Israeli withdrawal from remaining occupied points in southern Lebanon, and the release of Lebanese detainees. In return, the U.S. and its international partners pledge robust support for Lebanon's reconstruction and economic recovery - contingent upon full compliance with these demands. For decades, Hizbullah has operated beyond the authority of the Lebanese state, unaccountable to its institutions, immune from criticism, and increasingly divorced from the national interest. Its narrative of "resistance" has become a threadbare excuse for political domination, economic capture, and social coercion. It is not merely unwilling to relinquish its weapons - it is unwilling to acknowledge the authority of the very state it claims to protect. Hizbullah is no longer seen as an organic Lebanese actor, but as an Iranian asset whose wars do not rally national unity. We are witnessing the unraveling of a political-military entity whose bluff has been called. Its weapons were never about defending Lebanon, they were about dominating it. When faced with a genuine military threat, Hizbullah collapsed. Hizbullah's arsenal no longer serves as a deterrent against Israel. It has become a liability. The writer is an assistant professor of history at the American University of Beirut. 2025-08-07 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|