DAILY ALERT
Tuesday,
October 27, 2026
In-Depth Issues:

Spate of Shootings in Toronto Were Likely Paid For by Iran - Jonathon Gatehouse (CBC News)
    A CBC News investigation has pinpointed a dozen politically-motivated gun-for-hire shootings in Toronto that appear to have been financed by the Iranian government.
    The attacks targeted synagogues, a school, and businesses in the Greater Toronto Area, as well as the U.S. Consulate. Many of the shootings came in the hours and days after the U.S. and Israel began bombing Iran on Feb. 28.
    No one was injured in the shootings, which bore the hallmarks of gun-for-hire incidents: early morning attacks where suspects arrived via stolen cars and emptied handguns into building entranceways, while they or their accomplices filmed the acts on a phone.
    In recent years, the Iranian government and its intelligence service have been linked to plots and attacks in Germany, the Netherlands, the UK, Australia and the U.S.



U.S. Wants Control of Israeli Technology in Exchange for Aid - Dean Shmuel Elmas (Globes)
    The stumbling block in talks over a new U.S.-Israel defense aid package is not financial support but control of technology.
    The current Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on U.S. military aid to Israel expires in 2028 and Prime Minister Netanyahu has said Israel can no longer rely on U.S. defense assistance in its current form.
    U.S. officials are demanding not merely the sharing of knowledge, but the transfer of Israeli expertise to the U.S., to be managed by the U.S., including patents and joint development programs.
    This is a scenario that Israel cannot accept. It means the erosion of the fundamental technological advantage held by its defense industries in the international market.
    Even after a MOU has been signed, Congress must still approve aid to Israel annually. If the majority shifts to the Democrats in the midterm elections, this may pose a challenge, even with an MOU in place.



Europe's New Financial Transparency Rules Expose Iran's IRGC Networks - Ella Rosenberg (Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs)
    New regulations announced on Oct. 16, 2026, represent a major operational turning point in the EU's counter-proliferation and anti-financial crime architecture.
    Their practical effect is the eradication of the structural ambiguity that sanctioned actors, like the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), have historically exploited to penetrate Europe.
    The regulation dismantles the viability of front companies, nominee arrangements, and multi-layered cross-border trusts used to establish European corporate footprints and secure access to banking, payment, and capital market infrastructures.
    The writer is an Iran and financial terrorism expert and a senior research fellow at the Jerusalem Center.



Intel Buys Israeli Quantum Computing Company Classiq for $2.2 Billion - Assaf Gilead (Globes)
    Intel has announced the acquisition of Israeli quantum computing software company Classiq for $2.2 billion. Classiq will become Intel's global development center for quantum computing.
    Since its founding six years ago, Classiq has established itself as the primary standard for quantum operating systems.



How Anti-Zionism Harms Palestinians - Jeremy Havardi (JNS)
    Moderate Palestinians know that you cannot build a Palestinian state by destroying its Jewish neighbor.
    The only viable path to long-term self-determination is a political process that recognizes the legitimacy and permanence of a Jewish state.
    The refusal of anti-Zionist Palestinian leaders to accept offers of statehood from 1937 onwards has condemned the Palestinian people to decades of war, insecurity, poverty and statelessness.
    The BDS movement has also been disastrous for Palestinians. By calling for Israel's destruction, its advocates signal to the Palestinians that they should abandon all attempts at coexistence with their Israeli neighbors because their state will soon disappear.
    This fuels impossible dreams. Naturally, Israel's refusal to bend in the face of such rejectionism only further embitters Palestinians committed to BDS strategy.
    Before Oct. 7, 163,000 Palestinians were employed in Israel and in Judea and Samaria. Their income accounted for 20% of Palestinian GDP, injecting $4 billion into the economy.
    The Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics noted that 22.5% of employed Palestinians in Judea and Samaria worked in Israel or in Israeli communities in 2022.
    After Oct. 7, Israel suspended all work permits. While some have been reinstated, more than 100,000 jobs for Palestinians have been lost.
    The writer is director of the B'nai B'rith UK Bureau of International Affairs.



Giving Up the Word "Zionism" - David Hazony (Jewish News of Northern California)
    Should Jews retire the word "Zionism" since it has become a lightning rod of hate?
    Our enemies will persecute us given the chance. They don't play by the rules. They don't use evidence and reason. They are committed to their conspiracy theories, their resentments, their violence and their insatiable need for destruction.
    The demands they place on us right now involve changing who we are - the names we choose for ourselves, our commitment to Israel. That alone should be reason enough to say "no."
    There will be no relief if we give up the word "Zionist." The enemy will not pocket the win and go home. When it comes to antisemitism, every conciliation brings only further demands.
    Zionism was the most important movement of Jewish liberation in thousands of years. It gave us back our homeland, our confidence, our spine.
    To be a Zionist is to assert that Jews not only have rights, but also a home and a future.
    To give up on that, of all words, is to concede the argument - to implicitly endorse the libel that Zionism is a genocidal, colonialist, supremacist belief.
    But the first reason to say we are still Zionists is that it should be a necessary, reflexive response to anyone who wants us to submit to external pressure, as a precursor to pressing us on other things: our identity, our communities.
    That's reason enough to say that, yes, we are Zionists. Look into our eyes. We won't give up the word.
    The writer is director and Steinhardt senior fellow at the Z3 Institute for Jewish Priorities in Palo Alto.



Israel Has What It Takes to Solve the Challenges It Faces - Judah Taub (Jewish News-UK)
    If we define Israel by its problems alone, the picture is gloomy. If we define it by the things it has to work with to solve those problems, the picture changes.
    Start with basic demographics. Israel's fertility rate is double the OECD average. Almost every developed country is planning for a shrinking, aging workforce. Israel is planning for growth.
    On Oct. 7, I was called up to the reserves, where I have led technology teams working on urgent battlefield problems.
    What struck me was how fast people moved. Within days, volunteer networks were outpacing ministries.
    Israelis who had spent the previous year arguing bitterly with one another were standing side by side, building, fixing, and improvising.
    No government can legislate that kind of initiative. Israel has it in abundance.



News Resources - North America, Europe, and Asia:
  • Netanyahu and His Main Opponent Disagree - but Not on Israel's Security - Anat Peled
    Israelis will vote on Tuesday in the first national election since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attacks, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot the leading candidates.
        Eisenkot has said he would end Hamas's rule in Gaza within 18 months - whether through President Trump's peace plan or by force - and told Israel Radio he supported building Israeli communities in the West Bank and opposes the establishment of a Palestinian state. "I am adamantly opposed to a foreign army between the river and the sea," he said, referring to the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea.
        The statements leave little separating him on security issues from Netanyahu. Netanyahu's opponents "are basically saying the same thing in a more elegant way," said Tamar Hermann, a senior fellow at the Israel Democracy Institute.
        Israelis remain concerned about the prospect of another Oct. 7-like attack and support continued troop presence in Gaza and Lebanon. There is now greater support for building Israeli communities in the West Bank compared with previous years, according to polls. (Wall Street Journal)
  • Hizbullah Readies for New Regional War with Funds from Iran - Laila Bassam
    Hizbullah has spent three months since June preparing for a resumption of hostilities with Israel after receiving an infusion of cash from Iran, according to Lebanese security personnel. It is focusing on procuring explosives and producing drones that can be flown into Israeli positions. Sources said the group had received tens of millions of dollars from Iran to help boost its military capabilities, in addition to $200 million to aid displaced Shi'ite families. (Reuters)
        See also War-Weary Hizbullah Supporters Press Group to Stay Out of New Conflict
    Fears of another devastating war with Israel are fueling discontent among Hizbullah's supporters in Lebanon, amid concerns that the Iran-backed group could again enter a conflict in support of Tehran and fears that up to one million Shi'ites could be displaced from Beirut's southern suburbs.
        Avoiding another wave of displacement now takes precedence in decisions involving military action, sources said. Hizbullah official Nawaf Mousawi said in an interview, "At this stage, the resistance prefers to spare its people."
        Opposition sources pointed to the growing military imbalance between Hizbullah and Israel. Israel's advantages in firepower and technology undermined Hizbullah's prospects of launching another conflict that could force an Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory or halt Israeli operations against the group. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
  • BBC Pays 400,000 Pounds to Award-Winning Jewish Producer over Antisemitism - Gordon Rayner
    The BBC has agreed on a 400,000-pound payout to Jewish documentary-maker Lucie Kon, who was the victim of antisemitism at the broadcasting company. Kon, whose work for the BBC won awards including an Oscar and an Emmy, says she was victimized in the wake of the Oct. 7 terrorist attacks in Israel by colleagues who said Zionists such as her were "evil." She was told that "if you want to call Hamas terrorists then you have to call Israel terrorists, too" and that she should "think about what drove Hamas to do what they did."
        When she made a formal complaint about her treatment, the BBC told Kon to stay at home for months, sidelined her, and eventually put her out of work. She instigated unfair dismissal proceedings against the BBC, which agreed to pay her substantial compensation, without any admission of liability. Kon has said that other Jewish colleagues are still being bullied and abused.
        Kon, 57, said her religion had not been an issue for the first 22 years of her BBC career, but after the Oct. 7 attacks: "It was like having 'Jew' stamped on my forehead." Colleagues told her that a documentary about the murder, rape and mutilation of hundreds of Israeli civilians at a music festival on Oct. 7 should "contextualize" the terrorist attack and empathize with what had driven the perpetrators.
        When she pitched an idea for a documentary about Oct. 7, she was told she could not oversee it because as a Jew she was "too partial." She said: "They tried to stop me doing my job because I'm a Jew. I think I became a problem. I think I made too much noise about being a Jew inside the BBC. I stood up for my community. I was open about being a Zionist....and I lost my job as a result."  (Telegraph-UK)
News Resources - Israel and the Mideast:
  • IDF Strikes Terror Threats in Gaza - Emanuel Fabian
    The Israel Defense Forces announced on Monday that a strike in Gaza on Thursday killed Ahmed Zahir Fuad Abu-Odeh, a Hamas engineering commander; a strike on Saturday killed Mohammed Halawa, a Hamas intelligence commander; and another strike on Saturday killed Mohammed Anan Mohammed al-Rawagh, the commander of a cell in Hamas's Nukhba Force.
        Strikes in Gaza on Sunday killed Alaa Abu Zaid and Hamdan Suleiman Ibrahim Abu Amra of Islamic Jihad and Fawzi Salam Odat Allah Sawarha, a Hamas sniper.
        The IDF said the six had been advancing attacks on troops and Israeli civilians, and acted to restore the capabilities of the two terror groups "in systematic violation of the ceasefire." They were killed to "remove the threat they posed."  (Times of Israel)
  • IDF Scans Hebron Neighborhood for Underground Tunnels - Emanuel Fabian
    IDF troops have located an underground passageway adjacent to the home of one of the Palestinian gunmen who carried out Friday's deadly shooting attack in the West Bank city of Hebron. A tunnel shaft, 15 meters deep and 75 cm. wide, was found during scans of 500 buildings and structures in the neighborhood where the two gunmen lived. (Times of Israel)
  • IDF Demolishes Terrorist Memorials in PA - Elisha Ben Kimon
    Palestinians report that IDF forces have demolished 10 memorials commemorating terrorists in West Bank towns and villages. (Ynet News)
Global Commentary and Think-Tank Analysis:

    Israel and the West

  • How UK Sanctions on Israel Ignore the Oslo Accords - Lt.-Col. (res.) Maurice Hirsch and Amb. Alan Baker
    The announcement by British Foreign Minister Ed Miliband that the UK government intends to impose sanctions on products manufactured by Israeli businesses in Judea and Samaria reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. The stated justification for the sanctions is the claim that Israeli communities in Judea and Samaria constitute a major obstacle to achieving a "two-state solution."
        Yet the UK Foreign Minister appears to be totally ignorant of the fact that neither the Oslo Accords between Israel and the Palestinian leadership, nor any other international determination, contain any commitment to a "two-state solution." Instead, the parties committed to negotiating an agreement on the "permanent status" of the territory that could ostensibly lead to one, two or three states, or any other agreed solution. But neither the UK nor any other authority has the right to impose any solution on the parties.
        In light of the UK's misguided fixation with the "two-state solution," one may ask why the UK has never imposed sanctions on Palestinians who have repeatedly rejected the "two-state solution" and openly engaged in advocating, financing and supporting terror? Why did the UK not impose sanctions on Yasser Arafat for rejecting the peace deal brokered by U.S. President Clinton in 2000, or on Mahmoud Abbas for rejecting the 2008 peace deal offered by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert?
        On the issue of Israeli citizens constructing homes, the UK Foreign Secretary appears to be ignorant of the terms of the Oslo Accords, which allow Israel to build in the part of the territory it administers (Area C), just as the Palestinian Authority builds in Areas A and B under its jurisdiction. The accords contain no provision preventing planning, zoning, and construction by the parties in areas under their respective jurisdiction.
        Countries that supported the Oslo Accords are now adopting policies, at the behest of the Palestinian leadership, that fundamentally undermine the accords. Invalidating the accords could mean invalidating the Palestinian Authority itself.
        Maurice Hirsch is former director of the Military Prosecution in Judea and Samaria. Alan Baker is former Legal Adviser and Deputy Director-General of Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs.  (Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs)
  • Poisonous Lies about Zionism - Adam LeBor
    The precisely engineered stone paving of the Pilgrimage Road in the Old City of Jerusalem, built 2,200 years ago, has recently been restored and the road opened to the public. Roman legionnaires ran amok here in 70CE, burning the shops and houses and slaughtering the Jewish rebels.
        The road is proof that Zionism is not a "settler-colonial" ideology. In truth, the Jewish connection to Israel reaches back millennia to the time of Abraham. Jewish kings and dynasties exercised centuries of intermittent sovereignty from the Davidic era, around 3,000 years ago.
        The father of modern Zionism, Theodor Herzl, argued that deep-rooted antisemitism meant the Jews had no future in Europe. He was correct, as later events proved. Modern Zionism was one of many modern anti-colonial movements pressuring the creaking Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian empires to grant freedom to their subject peoples. Palestinian leaders at the time - unlike their counterparts nowadays - acknowledged the historic Jewish connection to the Holy Land.
        In November 1947, the UN passed Resolution 181. It proposed dividing Palestine, then under British rule, into independent Jewish and Arab states. The Zionist leadership accepted it. The Palestinians did not. The secretary-general of the Arab League declared that a Jewish state would lead to "a war of extermination and momentous massacre." In May 1948, five Arab armies invaded. There was no war of extermination. Instead Israel, fighting for its life, won.
        Offered numerous opportunities for peace and statehood, the Palestinians have refused every one. Instead they - and Hamas - have been rewarded by Western countries with recognition of a ghost state that does not exist. (Telegraph-UK)


  • Gaza

  • What Are Gazans Saying about Disarming Hamas? - Orit Perlov
    Gaza social media discourse has recently shown a clear shift regarding the disarmament of Hamas. Once an ideological symbol whose relinquishment was seen as surrender, the issue has become the subject of pragmatic debate about the benefits of continuing the armed struggle weighed against the heavy price Gaza's population is paying.
        Sustained and substantial online debate about disarmament took shape mainly over the past year, as the debate over disarming moved beyond Hamas's critics and began to appear among Hamas supporters as well. Among those who criticize Hamas, disarmament marks a shift in priorities resulting from the consequences of the war: for now, the population's survival and reconstruction take precedence over preserving Hamas's weapons.
        Pragmatic voices are also being heard among Hamas supporters, willing to discuss disarmament as part of an arrangement that would end the war and allow Gaza's reconstruction. This should not be interpreted as abandoning the idea of resistance. Rather, it marks a willingness to give up some military capability to ensure Hamas's survival and allow the armed struggle to continue.
        To understand how such a concession has become possible involves the distinction in Palestinian discourse between defeat (hazima) and surrender (istislam). A military defeat can be explained as the result of an imbalance of power and does not require abandoning the legitimacy of the struggle. Surrender, by contrast, carries the connotation of humiliation.
        The online discourse on disarmament reflects a rare moment in which the boundaries of debate in Gaza are shifting. For the first time, issues once treated as beyond question are being publicly reassessed in light of the war's consequences. Underlying this shift is a recognition that Gaza's reality has changed. The weapons are shifting from a source of legitimacy to a subject of scrutiny: What have they achieved? What is the cost of keeping them?
        The writer, former co-editor of the Israel Foreign Ministry website in Arabic, is a research fellow at INSS. (Institute for National Security Studies-Tel Aviv University)


  • Palestinian Arabs

  • Israel Is Just the Pretext, the Real Target Is the West - Bassam Tawil
    Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad praised the Oct. 23 attack near the West Bank city of Hebron that killed two Israeli soldiers, describing it as heroic. Why should anyone expect peace between the Palestinians and Israel while Palestinian leaders glorify terrorism and armed groups continue to attack Israelis? How can anyone even talk about establishing a Palestinian state next to Israel while Palestinian leaders and armed groups "welcome" the killing of Jews?
        A central obstacle to peace is the continuing willingness of Palestinians to celebrate violence against Israelis while presenting terrorism as supposedly legitimate national resistance. Yet Israel is just the pretext. What the West is up against is the desire of Muslim extremists, with a leg-up from Marxists, to overthrow the "corrupt" West and replace it with Islamic Sharia law and eventually a global caliphate.
        The Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led massacre demonstrated the devastating consequences of an extremist Islamist ideology that treats people of other religions as a legitimate target. A few terrified leaders in the West might think that if there were a Palestinian state, it might keep the mob quiet for a while. Yes, until breakfast.
        Jihadists have no problem murdering civilians. They are convinced they will be rewarded for it by Allah in the next life. So no matter how many babies or elderly people they kill, torture or mutilate, it is all good. Statements after the Hebron attack suggest that major Palestinian factions continue to regard violence as a source of pride and a means of advancing their primary objectives - the elimination of the "Zionist entity" (Israel) and overthrowing infidel democracies in the rest of the world.
        The silence of the Palestinian Authority - and other Arab and Muslim leaders - is also significant. No public statements condemning the Hebron attack have been issued by Palestinian leaders or representatives or any other Muslim world leader. The Palestinian organizations that praise the attackers present themselves as champions of the people. They are not. Like the ruling butchers of Iran, they are holding the Palestinians hostage. If they hope to live, they cannot even protest.
        The Palestinian Authority is frequently described by Western governments as a potential partner for peace. If they wish to be regarded as a credible alternative to Hamas, they need to demonstrate that difference in practice. Condemning Israeli actions while refusing to condemn the deliberate killing of Israelis is no foundation for peace. The PA is part of the problem; it is not the solution - and wishing it were will not make it so, with its long-standing policy of paying monthly stipends to Palestinian terrorists who murder or wound Jews. (Gatestone Institute)
  • The Arab Terrorist War Against Jews in Judea and Samaria - Melanie Phillips
    There are about 500,000 Jewish residents of Judea and Samaria, and they are under constant attack by local Arabs. On Oct. 19, 10 Arabs and Israeli activists ambushed a Jewish resident riding an ATV off-road and threw stones at him. When he dismounted, the attackers tried to run him over with a tractor. On Oct. 20, 15 Israeli activists, photographers and Arabs blocked security roads with stones and boulders.
        On Oct. 21, there were at least two Arab stone-throwing attacks on Israeli cars. On Oct. 22, Arabs and Israeli activists armed with clubs threw stones at Jewish shepherds. On Oct. 24, when a Jewish resident was out for a run, Arabs tried to hit him with their vehicle. Two firebomb attacks were reported, and one with pipe bombs. Sheep were stolen from a Jewish farm. Jewish shepherds were wounded by Arab gunfire; two more Jewish locals were fired at.
        There can be no justification for Western media and politicians failing to acknowledge this Arab terrorist war being waged against Jewish residents in Judea and Samaria.
        The writer is a columnist for The Times-UK.  (JNS)


  • Antisemitism

  • "The Pattern" Theory of Antisemitism Explains a Moral Sickness - Zoe Strimpel
    The Pattern is a theory of antisemitism proposed by the physicist David Deutsch. It is "a contagious, irrational pattern of thinking about morality that has persisted for millennia, characterized by a compulsive need to legitimize hurting Jews for being Jews." "Legitimization" means "acting to protect [the hurting of Jews] from being deemed morally wrong, dishonorable, taboo or intolerable."
        Legitimizing the hurting of Jews is how a lot of antisemitism works these days in the West. Relatively little of it involves physical violence. Most of it involves making contorted and bizarre arguments, in polite or virtuous language, in order to defend, at any cost, regimes or groups or actions whose main purpose is to hurt Jews.
        The most common version now is that Israel is committing a genocide, and that the war on Hamas is driven by Israeli zeal for killing Palestinian children. Such a position regularly leads people to excuse and lessen actions of Hamas on Oct. 7 and of Palestinian terror in general.
        Antisemitism is not in fact principally a hatred, as coherent as an ideology. When hating or detesting Jews is widespread too, the Pattern posits, this is "a consequence, not a cause, of the need to legitimize hurting Jews." German composer Richard Wagner had an inkling of what was at work in him and his brethren. In 1850, he described "that unconscious feeling, which manifests itself as the People's inherent disgust at Jewish existence." The impulse precedes the manifestation.
        Ayaan Hirsi Ali explained the predisposition toward antisemitism: "In Saudi Arabia, everything bad was the fault of the Jews. When the air conditioner broke or suddenly the water stopped running, the Saudi women next door used to say the Jews did it." That there were no Jews there made no difference.
        Why it works like this, only in relation to Jews, is not yet explained. But for some reason, it always does. Antisemitism is capable of uniting and mobilizing unbelievably widespread and disparate blocs. Only the Pattern accurately describes the uniquely bizarre moral contortions, contradictions and flagrantly illogical arguments required for ensuring that pathways to harming Jews remain open.
        Only through recognizing that the Pattern is a moral sickness can we begin to see its magnitude and power. As Deutsch says, where there is sufficient evil, you will likely see the Pattern. "No demographic is exempt from it."  (Telegraph-UK)
Observations:

Respecting Israeli Democracy - Jonathan S. Tobin (JNS)
  • Many of those commenting on Israeli politics from America are, as a rule, disinclined to let the Israeli people decide their own fate. What they want is an Israeli leader who will comply with the policies they want to impose on the Middle East.
  • Maybe those eager to impose their will on the Jewish state should take a step back and simply respect the right of the Israelis to choose their own government. Just as important, they should give equal respect to the right of that government to obey the will of its voters and conduct its policies in a manner to ensure their security.
  • Instead, many Americans remain eager to impose their fantasies about a two-state solution the Palestinian Arabs have never wanted. That would raise the possibility of a repeat of the horrors of the Hamas-led Palestinian terror attacks on Israeli communities on Oct. 7, 2023.
  • No matter who prevails in 2026, Americans need to respect the verdict of Israel's voters. They don't have to like Netanyahu, Eisenkot or anyone who might become prime minister. But they do need to stop falling prey to the notion that Washington's role is to give orders to Jerusalem against its interests or to help those Israelis who can't win an election there.
  • The two countries aren't always going to agree. As much as they currently are and should be aligned in most respects, their national interests are not identical. Sometimes, as has frequently happened in recent decades, Israel's government must act to defend its people when it might serve America's interests to avoid any conflict.
  • The U.S. is the senior partner in the alliance and due some deference. Yet the conceit that Americans are a better judge of Israeli national interests than the Israelis is simply wrong. The Israeli people have been paying attention to events in their region over the course of the last three decades since the Oslo peace process and they are aware that the Palestinians and Iran don't want peace; they want Israel's destruction.
  • No conceivable Israeli government will ever go along with a withdrawal from Judea and Samaria or from parts of Jerusalem. And no American government will ever have the power to persuade their leaders otherwise. The better part of wisdom for any administration is to listen to the Israeli people and treat their choices as something they do not have the right or the power to overturn.

Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs
Daily Alert is published on Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday.
Unsubscribe from Daily Alert.