Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Ha'aretz) Sam Sokol - Despite calls for Jerusalem to provide Kyiv with missile defense technology, experts believe that logistical and technological limitations mean that Israel's Iron Dome would provide little practical benefit to Ukraine. Tal Inbar, a senior research fellow at the U.S.-based Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, believes that while the system could likely intercept some Russian munitions, such as Grad rockets, the large land mass of Ukraine and the variety of Russia's projectiles means that exporting Iron Dome batteries "is more of a theoretical question and wishful thinking by Ukraine" than a practical solution. "The larger the country is, you need a much larger number of radars and interceptors. Israeli is a small country, in that regard it's an advantage to missile defense. That's not the case in Ukraine," he said. Saudi forces, with their advanced missile defense capabilities, are still struggling to prevent Houthi strikes because of the large territory they have to defend. Moreover, Russia is using ballistic and hypersonic missiles which cannot be stopped by a short-range system like Iron Dome. There would also be logistical difficulties to providing Ukraine with Iron Dome. The "implementation of such a system is complex and a long process, so even if Israel was willing...the time to make it operational is not so short." Beyond that, the IDF has a limited supply of interceptors, with the U.S. Congress only recently approving a $1 billion allocation for Israel to replenish the missiles it expended in shooting down Hamas rockets during last summer's fighting. "So it is a little bit naive [to think] that Israel could supply other countries with a sufficient amount of interceptors," Inbar said. 2022-03-24 00:00:00Full Article
Why Israel's Iron Dome Won't Really Help Ukraine Against Russia
(Ha'aretz) Sam Sokol - Despite calls for Jerusalem to provide Kyiv with missile defense technology, experts believe that logistical and technological limitations mean that Israel's Iron Dome would provide little practical benefit to Ukraine. Tal Inbar, a senior research fellow at the U.S.-based Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, believes that while the system could likely intercept some Russian munitions, such as Grad rockets, the large land mass of Ukraine and the variety of Russia's projectiles means that exporting Iron Dome batteries "is more of a theoretical question and wishful thinking by Ukraine" than a practical solution. "The larger the country is, you need a much larger number of radars and interceptors. Israeli is a small country, in that regard it's an advantage to missile defense. That's not the case in Ukraine," he said. Saudi forces, with their advanced missile defense capabilities, are still struggling to prevent Houthi strikes because of the large territory they have to defend. Moreover, Russia is using ballistic and hypersonic missiles which cannot be stopped by a short-range system like Iron Dome. There would also be logistical difficulties to providing Ukraine with Iron Dome. The "implementation of such a system is complex and a long process, so even if Israel was willing...the time to make it operational is not so short." Beyond that, the IDF has a limited supply of interceptors, with the U.S. Congress only recently approving a $1 billion allocation for Israel to replenish the missiles it expended in shooting down Hamas rockets during last summer's fighting. "So it is a little bit naive [to think] that Israel could supply other countries with a sufficient amount of interceptors," Inbar said. 2022-03-24 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|